NC: Warning about scam involving NC sex offender registry

Source: wsoctv.com 10/11/23

CALDWELL COUNTY, N.C. — The Caldwell County Sheriff’s Office is warning residents about a new scam that involves someone impersonating a police officer and people on the North Carolina sex offender registry.

According to the sheriff’s office, several people have reported that they were contacted by someone saying they were with the Lenoir Police Department. The person said that some sex offenders were violating their requirements and that if they brought the offender into the Caldwell County Sheriff’s Office, they would receive a check for $5,000. The caller said the resident had to send them money on gift cards first and would be reimbursed.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I’ve run into this type of scam before. The first time the twerp impersonated a county sheriff’s office detective and wanted cash. I told him I would meet him in the parking lot of the sheriff’s office. That ended that call quite quickly. The second time I didn’t even bother calling back the crook. The thing to remember about law enforcement is that if you have a warrant out for your arrest, they will not call you first. They just come and get you.

If you have an iPhone, you can tell if a call came from a verified phone number local to the location given if there is a checkmark next to the entry in the incoming calls log. If there is no check, it’s possible it was a spoofed location, and it’s very unlikely a call coming from a government line would not have the check mark. The scammers are good at spoofing locations to appear local, but their calls, in my experience, always fail this test. Android might have a similar feature. I simply don’t answer and calls or return calls not from a number verified to be associated with its listed location.

I’m in California and I now get calls like this at a rate of about once a month. The last few, I’ve started to mess back at them when they call.

However, this particular scam is concerning. It sounds like they are also playing into peoples’ thirst for vigilantism. The end result, if it goes as planned, is that the scammer gets paid and you get kidnapped.

Isn’t it so nice of the government to traffic its citizens? Instigate, provoke, even promote, so many crimes and different forms of this cruel and unusual punishment …All while hiding behind the safety shield of their SORA racket! Inciting violence is a crime, even when it’s the legislative branch doing it. KNOWINGLY

This could be avoided if there were rules that the registration department (police, sheriff) should have to follow in contacting registrants with regard to their status. Most important is that all official communications, directives, and potential violations should be directed through postal mail from the department itself, if not a direct visit by the authorities to the person himself. Emphasize that the department will NEVER call, text, or email any registrant with directives or with monetary threats.

In short, make sure that the registrant is empowered with the knowledge that he/she can safely ignore (or better yet, report) any telephonic directions give to them by non-verifiable phone or digital contacts. While to most of us it seems obvious, remember that the current emotional component of the average registrant is already on a hair trigger, and with any threat by a perceived authority can override the logical thinking that would preclude being taken in by scammers. Knowing the rules the department must engage in would be significant in overcoming this trigger reflex that could result in a calamitous loss of money.

I would even go so far as to have this type of bill introduced in the state legislature that mandates disclosure by registration officers of such rules, and for the department to follow the rules.

Last edited 4 months ago by Eric Knight

What a surprise!😒 This telephone scam has worked so successfully against vulnerable Registrants that the scammers (🤬) have decided to expand it to a much larger public population!!:

U.S. Marshals Service warns of nationwide scam